{
  "id": "L3-ULIUA-01",
  "name": "Consent-First Structural Charter",
  "layer": 3,
  "type": "charter_invariant",
  "domain": "cross-domain governance / system design",
  "charter_statement": "Cross-boundary interactions shall default to explicit, legible, and revisable consent wherever capacity permits.",
  "comparator_tiering": {
    "constitutional": [
      "Consentful authorization over coerced or implicit crossing."
    ],
    "operational_subordinate": [
      "Throughput",
      "Efficiency",
      "Compliance velocity",
      "Cost minimization"
    ],
    "note": "Operational comparators may not override constitutional consent without governance-level justification."
  },
  "grounding": {
    "primitives": [
      "P1",
      "P2",
      "P3",
      "P4",
      "P5",
      "P6",
      "P8",
      "P9",
      "P10"
    ],
    "composites": [
      "C5",
      "C6",
      "C10",
      "C11",
      "C12"
    ]
  },
  "governance_implications": [
    "Where power asymmetry is high, governance must scaffold consent.",
    "Where reversibility is low, consent thresholds must rise.",
    "Comparator revision cadence must preserve consent priority."
  ],
  "structural_predictions": [
    "Reduced coercion-based stabilization overhead.",
    "Increased adaptive stability via feedback.",
    "Lower cascade risk from resistance dynamics."
  ],
  "failure_modes": [
    "Symbolic consent without capacity (C6 shadow).",
    "Comparator ossification (C11).",
    "Ledger omission of affected parties (C5 shadow).",
    "Compliance replacing resonance (C7 dynamic)."
  ]
}